(Hexasim)戦国時代シリーズ第2弾:天下統一 ▼龍虎さん曰く『関ヶ原の家康本陣(12駒で構成)を見ても、郎党の本多や大久保に混ざって、遠藤慶隆(2駒)や丹羽氏次、西尾光教といった外様の陣借り勢まであって、その考証の正しさには唸らされる。国産の関ケ原ゲームでも、ここまでこだわったユニット表記は中々無い』とのことだった。
by ysga-blog
| 2017-07-01 16:00
| 【戦国日本ゲーム:総合】
|
Comments(9)
Commented
by
ドスマン
at 2017-07-08 05:42
x
関ヶ原の家康本陣. It was very important for the designer team to give as much historical flawor as possible. It was a pity that some small clans have been very detailed like Ishida's vanguard and bigger ones were not. We still were limited to 12 counters by design and we wanted to split this big corps in 3 sub organizations. The idea was following:
18A. 前備 with 奥平信昌 (the defender of Nagashino castle), 牧野康成, 大久保忠佐, 高力清長, 丹羽氏次, 内藤信成 18B. 大番 with 徳川家康, 松平重勝, 本多正純, 酒井重忠, 永井直勝, 青山忠成, 西尾吉次, 阿部正次 18C. 後備 and 遊軍備 with 本多康俊, 遠藤慶隆n 酒井家次, etc Once this was given, François had to take painful design decisions.There are some more details here and there but always without creating a gameplay burden or killing the overall design pattern. And sorry for the mistakes, we made a few (Matsuno Shigemoto spelled Matsuo, etc)
0
Commented
by
ysga-blog at 2017-07-10 21:11
ドスマンさんのhistorical researchの正確さには称賛のほかありません。order of battleを眺めているだけで楽しめます。私の願いは日本でこの「天下統一」が広くプレイされることです。
ところで質問が2つあるのですが、もし分かれば教えてください。 ⑴ clan orderのattack〔8.2〕、movement〔8.3〕、defense〔8.4〕の最後に、EZOCにいるそのclanのcountersは、must attackしないといけませんよね? ⑵ 関ケ原〔21.4.1〕のundecided clansはNo ZOCですが、undecided clansに隣接している敵は、undecided clansを攻撃する義務はありませんか? Not must attack?
Commented
by
ドスマン
at 2017-07-11 14:29
x
(1) Yes the clan units in ZOC will attack (including units in regroup order)
"11.1. ...All enemy units in the ZoC of the activated units must be attacked during this activation phase. Exception 11.2. Non-obligatory attack :Units that are not in Attack (order) do not have to attack enemy units in their ZoC which are : • already attacked by another unit, or • on the other side of a “non-obligatory attack” hexside, as described on the Terrain Effect Chart." You may attack none, one or several of these units. (2) If an enemy is adjacent to only an undecided clan, they wil attack it (the undecided clan unit is in their enemy's ZOC). Only if there is another unit also adjacent, they can ignore it. So if you don't want them to join Ishida side, stay away.
Commented
by
贋魚屋
at 2017-07-12 22:02
x
なんか自信満々に戦闘序列を書かれると、つい重箱の隅を指摘したくなりますね。
恐らくその戦闘序列は明治25年に郷土史家が出版した「関原合戦図示」によるものですね。 どうも現在の通説と異なるようです。 1. 大久保忠佐、酒井家次、青山忠成、牧野康成は中仙道組です。 2. 後備についてですが、奥平信昌が南宮山の抑えで、これには松平忠政(大須賀忠政、榊原康政長男)が加わっています。 3. 内藤信成は沼津・興国寺城の守備を担当しています。 4. 奥平信昌は中仙道組と東海道組の両説あり。嫡子家昌は中仙道組で、奥平家史では中仙道組とされている。 5. 1万石の久野宗成が参加しているはず。 ※遠藤と丹羽については、当日参加は確実のようですが、陣借りしていたという証拠がちょっと見つかりませんでした。
Commented
by
ドスマン
at 2017-07-13 14:36
x
贋魚屋のコメント有難う. Effectively the order of battle is classic, related to the 明治25年 map, and old understanding of the battle.
Is 青山忠成 not prominently displayed in Sekigahara Warland Tokugawa headquarter ? Are 酒井家次 flags not in good place on Sekigahara folding screens ? If we take a modern position, one has also to rethink the size of the Tokugawa group. How can he have sent major retainers to Nakasendo with his heir, have left troups in Kanto with his other son, and still have as many as 30,000 troops in Sekigahara (do not count Ii Naomasa or Honda Tadakatsu) ? I would advocate to remove 18A or 18C group in a modernized order of battle ! As the hatamoto did not fight at Sekigahara, one will never know. To my opinion, after the war, many families had interest to be seen as well on the Nakasendo with the 2nd Shogun as at Sekigahara.
Commented
by
贋魚屋
at 2017-07-18 01:30
x
The army of Tokugawa to Uesugi was divided by three, the front, the main, and the rear.
The front force was taken by Yuuki Hideyasu because his territory was the closest to Uesugi. The main force was taken by Hidetada including major feudal lords of Tokugawa house. The rear force was tken by Ieyasu and the guard and reserve. You know, the main force was at Nakasen-do when the battle of Sekigahara and the rear force was at the main battle at that time; the front force remained at Utsunomiya against Uesugi. the main force was the attacking formation and the rear formation was the defensive formation. It means that the Tokugawa formation,which was the rear force, came to Sekigahara and had a few leaders and little flexibility. So I think you should not give enough leaders to Tokugawa formation at Sekigahara to move actively. They could move and stop as a block and could not move flexibility except Ii Naomasa's corp.
Commented
by
贋魚屋
at 2017-07-18 01:52
x
So Sakai Ietsugu and Aoyama Tadashige were popular feudal lords and the members of the main force who would attack.
Ieyasu's force had only Hatamoto who were minor lords. Most counts were in the main force and individual knights were in the rear force. Sakai clan and Aoyama clan were counts.
Commented
by
贋魚屋
at 2017-07-18 01:52
x
Tokugawa territory in Kanto had around three million people and around one third of them were ruled by the counts of Tokugawa house.
Others were ruled by Tokugawa directly and other minor knights, Hatamoto. Usually such population could supply sixtieth thousands to a hundred thousands soldiers. So Tokugawa house itself could deploy three armies with more than thirtieth thousands soldiers. The main point is not the number of soldiers but the character of each army. Ieyasu took a huge army but it was not flexible. So Ieyasu had to depend on Toyotomi's Daimyo, ie. Fukushim, Kuroda, Hosokawa, and so on to attack. The promotion and expanding of territories of Tokugawa's feudal lords were not because of the battle of Sekigahara. The expanding Tokugawa's teritory, their territory also expanded proportionately.
Commented
by
ドスマン
at 2017-08-01 23:27
x
贋魚屋iさんthanks for this very interesting discussion. If you whish we could discuss further via my mail: bertrandzoe@wanadoo.fr
Our design whish was to give some granularity to the bigger groups. Generally speaking, the numbers in this battle seem overstated. But we took the big numbers in the design for Tokugawa, Mori, Ukita and Kobayakawa. Now if Tokugawa really mustered 30,000 at Sekigahara (which I doubt), including the Ôban guard, he had more than a tight control on his samurai. Not a single headhunter tried to pursue the Shimazu who were fleeing just in front of them at the end of the battle ! They were too busy recording the pursuit by Ii Naomasa on their smartphone...
|
カテゴリ
全体 YSGA例会案内 例会/ゲーム対戦報告 珍しゲーム紹介 何度目だ(GMT)Holland ‘44 【マーケットガーデン作戦:総合】 (HJ)Market Garden作戦記 GJバルバロッサ電撃戦+台風/四部作 (GMT)バルバロッサ:軍集団 (GMT)スタグラ42&キャンスタ 青作戦&スターリングラード総合 【その他;独ソ戦:全般】 幕末・戊辰戦争対戦記 【大東亜"新秩序"戦争:総合】 【現代戦:総合】 【WW2戦略級ヨーロッパ:総合】 【Great War/WWⅠ:総合】 (GMT)1914シリーズ (SPI/HJ)WiE対戦記 (SPI/DG)ドラスタ対戦記 白ロシア:バグラチオン作戦戦記 ロシキャンⅡ(独ソ戦Ⅱ)戦記 (CMJ別冊)大祖国戦争記 ドラバル・ナルヴァ対戦記 パウ6対戦記 Dark Valleyファミリー 【スペイン内戦:総合】 【フレ・イン1812米英戦争:総合】 アメリカ独立戦争:総合 (GMT)ワシントンズ・ウォー戦記 米南北戦争150周年記念 対戦 150周年以後の米南北戦争:総合 (VG)Lee vs Grant対戦記 (G's)CWB:南北戦争旅団級 チットプルアクション米南北戦争 ASLコンコマコンフリ三大戦術 (GMT)ドーントレス作戦 推せる! 【その他戦術級ゲーム:総合】 【アルンヘムシステム系〔広義】 (FFG)指輪戦争:作戦/戦略級 (SPI/CM81)パットン第3軍対戦記 (SPI/CM133)グレネード作戦戦記 (SPI)タイフーン作戦 対戦記 CMJ GJ SA 歴群:モスクワ攻防戦 (HEXASIM) 自由/勝利への道戦記 CM39 ベルリン総進撃 対戦記 (CMJ123)VOB、赤い嵐対戦記 【広義での古代戦ゲーム総合】 【中世/近世ヨーロッパ:総合】 La Bataille対戦記 【その他ナポレオニック総合】 【ノルマンディー戦:総合】 〈GMT〉Normandy44 対戦記 (CM95)June-August44記 (NES)キリグラ・オバロ戦記 ヒトラス(HLG)対戦記 (GMT)アルデンヌ44対戦記 バルジ'81&BW&Trumpets 【その他バルジゲーム:総合】 【その他:WW2西部戦線:総合】 (GMT/CMJ)コカ・キャン対戦記 【砂漠の戦い/北ア・中東戦域】 チュニジア/カセリーヌ激闘譜 クレタ/マルタ島空挺降下戦記 シチリア対戦記 サレルノ・アンツィオ対戦記 (GMT/CMJ60)ウクライナ43戦記 (CMJ誌94号)ビルマ電撃航空戦 (MiH/CMJ#76)ヴェリキエ対戦記 (GDW/CMJ96)ホワイトデス対戦記 コルスン包囲戦(チェルカッシィ (HJ)Bitter End 対戦記 ハンガリー戦役'44-45記 (SPI/SA/CMJ106)コブラ対戦 CMJ17&SCS第48装甲軍団チル河 TDF:たちばなゆう同人ゲーム戦 (HJ/SunS)太平洋艦隊 対戦記 (VG/TT)Fleet series記 【ガレー船から空母まで海戦:総合】 【複葉機からジェット空戦ゲーム:総合】 【Korean War/朝鮮戦争全般】 【SF/ファンタジー全般】 【西方電撃戦'40という幻:総合】 【七年戦争/フレドキアン:総合】 【戦国日本ゲーム:総合】 【積み木ゲーム:総合】 【探検の世界史:総合】 【ロシア内戦:Rossyia総合】 大規模市街戦モノ City at War (GMT)バルベル再評価への道 独ソ戦ソリティアほかソロ専用ゲーム総合 例会場の案内写真 例会場 拾得物 発掘!古き良きYSGA例会写真 建軍の本義 未分類 最新の記事
最新のコメント
検索
タグ
記事ランキング
画像一覧
以前の記事
2024年 03月 2024年 02月 2024年 01月 2023年 12月 2023年 11月 2023年 10月 2023年 09月 2023年 08月 2023年 07月 2023年 06月 more... ファン
ブログジャンル
ブログパーツ
|
ファン申請 |
||